<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>&quot;White Trails&quot; Images</title>
		<link>http://www.geosap.org/forum/t-35716/white-trails-images</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;&quot;White Trails&quot; Images&quot;</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 07:36:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.geosap.org/forum/t-35716#post-98373</guid>
				<title>Re: &quot;White Trails&quot; Images</title>
				<link>http://www.geosap.org/forum/t-35716/white-trails-images#post-98373</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 15:40:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>AndyEich</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>62897</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>It's fine to do them later, as we get around to it.</p> <p>pseudo trail maps? … doesn't matter to me what they're called, we can always change it later.<br /> I imagine we'll come up with other characteristics than white trails that are needed to make the maps look good, so the name just needs to reflect that we're trying to mimic the look of published maps.</p> <p>I'm thinking that glades should just be outlined in white, otherwise they dominate the look of the map.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.geosap.org/forum/t-35716#post-92682</guid>
				<title>&quot;White Trails&quot; Images</title>
				<link>http://www.geosap.org/forum/t-35716/white-trails-images#post-92682</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 04:17:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>davidhowland14</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>62856</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>We need to decide what we want to do about them. I like them alot, but they seem rather complicated to explain the creation of in the standards page and the submissions page. I could write up an explanation, but we don't want to make it too complicated for people to submit maps. My current opinion would be for us to go through submitted maps and add the "white trails" image later, but that might be a lot of work. Opinons?</p> <p>we also need to decide on what we're going to call these pictures.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
